If we pick big enough lads in the forwards and midfield who can win a bit of ball and stop Tipp playing it out (and maintain it for the whole game) we will be grand. If we donât, we will be roasted.
âWe were coming into the first few games on the back of a lot of injuries, and we probably hadnât got enough balance in the team,â the new boss (below) explained.
âThereâs a bit of the team getting used to us as well, and exactly what we mean by our âworkrateâ piece. And, you know, we were getting it in training but we werenât getting it in games. But that has improved. The last two games have been very close to what weâre looking for.â
Interesting! Iâm off now to waste a morning at work trying to read those tea leaves
So you want forwards who can win a bit of ball & who can stop the Tipperary backs?..does actually being able to score come into the equation or are you hoping for a 0-00 to 0-00 result?
Honestly, I would have winning the ball as first criteria and scoring with it as second. Obviously, if the two could be combined it is infinitely preferable. But a lad that has the ball might score, a skillful lad without the ball will never score.
In the last three games against Tipp, championship last year and the last two league meetings, the forwards couldnât win the ball and couldnât stop them coming out. So our backs just had the ball rained in on top of them all day. They actually did ok in all 3 games but Tipp just had to score from a small percentage of attacks and they were going to wallop us due to the amount of attacks (and our inability to score).
But I donât think my point is strictly applicable in all cases, in Keaney, Sutcliffe, Hayes, maybe Winters and hopefully Dillon - we have lads who can do both.
Good points made there. With the lads you mentioned as potentially able to do both the challenge is finding their best positions and leaving them there to develop as a single forward unit.
Where did I mention skillful lads who canât win any ball??
If weâre relying on Keaney scores from play to win us games weâre more fcuked than I thought. His scoring rate over the years for a player of his reputation is frankly embarrassing. Suthcliffe & Dillon not a whole lot better.
We scored 1-19 v Tipp last year in Championship. Weâll be doing well to get near that tally this weekend.
Which is why the number of injuries (or the injury policy), Cualaâs run and DIT & DCUs runs have not made the job any easier. The upside of it of course is that is other lads have got a chance. The key next will be to gell everyone into a team in time for Championship.
Itâs not Sunday Iâm worried about, itâs Championship in the summer. Are we going to go into it with a big physical team who will be ran off the park.
Dublin: C Cooley; C OâCallaghan, E OâDonnell, F Ă Riain Broin; S Barrett, C Crummey (0-01), S Moran; B Quinn, N McMorrow; D Treacy (0-11, 8f), L Rushe (0-02), E Dillon; C OâSullivan (1-01), R OâDwyer (0-02), D Burke.
Subs: J Madden for Barrett (24), F Whitely for McMorrow (h.t.), D OâCallaghan (0-01) for Burke (h.t.), T Connolly for Moran (50), R McBride (0-01) for Treacy (58).
Off course you didnât say skillful lads who couldnât win ball, as I didnât say big lads who had no skill. It is the relative degrees of both that are being discussed.
I never thought of any aspect of Keaneyâs career as being embarrassing, but each to their own as they say.
Not ever forward needs to be scoring. If Keaney starts at 11 and Maher starts at 6 for Tipp. I would be delighted if Conal manages to drag Maher who is probably one of best defenders in the business out of position. Then that might open a gap for Hayes or Winters. So happy days with that.